<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Saab 29 Tunnan	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/</link>
	<description>High Quality Digital Aviation Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:25:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gaëtan Marie		</title>
		<link>https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/#comment-12</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaëtan Marie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gaetanmarie.com/?p=964#comment-12</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/#comment-11&quot;&gt;E.J. Brammer&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for the kind words on my work!

I didn&#039;t forget the Saab 21/21R, but I don&#039;t consider as excellent so I wouldn&#039;t include it this &quot;series of excellent fighters&quot;. I think all the later Saab fighters (Tunnan, Draken, Viggen and now Gripen) are extremely good aircraft but in my humble opinion, the J-21 was not nearly as outstanding as these later Saab designs.

I hope this explains my comment. :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/#comment-11">E.J. Brammer</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for the kind words on my work!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t forget the Saab 21/21R, but I don&#8217;t consider as excellent so I wouldn&#8217;t include it this &#8220;series of excellent fighters&#8221;. I think all the later Saab fighters (Tunnan, Draken, Viggen and now Gripen) are extremely good aircraft but in my humble opinion, the J-21 was not nearly as outstanding as these later Saab designs.</p>
<p>I hope this explains my comment. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E.J. Brammer		</title>
		<link>https://www.gaetanmarie.com/saab-29-tunnan/#comment-11</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.J. Brammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2017 04:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gaetanmarie.com/?p=964#comment-11</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please go back, and look again at the J-21. It was 1st, both as an indigenous fighter design for Saab using a pusher-prop and Ejection seat (kind of needed, eh?), and then as a Jet-Powered fighter (removed the DB V-engine, and put in a Whittle Jet, much like a DH Vampire). The J-29 took two leaps, a Nene engine, and Swept-back wings, but, I think the aerodynamics borrowed heavily from Kurt Tank&#039;s ideas, such as the TA-154. I love your Artwork, very nice, quite accurately detailed! Just be sure other &#039;details&#039; are as good.  Good Work!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please go back, and look again at the J-21. It was 1st, both as an indigenous fighter design for Saab using a pusher-prop and Ejection seat (kind of needed, eh?), and then as a Jet-Powered fighter (removed the DB V-engine, and put in a Whittle Jet, much like a DH Vampire). The J-29 took two leaps, a Nene engine, and Swept-back wings, but, I think the aerodynamics borrowed heavily from Kurt Tank&#8217;s ideas, such as the TA-154. I love your Artwork, very nice, quite accurately detailed! Just be sure other &#8216;details&#8217; are as good.  Good Work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
